TECH in AMERICA (TiA)

SHARING AMERICA'S TECH NEWS FROM THE VALLEY TO THE ALLEY

Bank Of America: There Are 300,000 Reasons That Tesla Is Massively Overvalued

by Rob Wile, courtesy Business Insider

car-69[1]

There have been few hotter stocks this year than Tesla.

 

The electric car manufacturer helmed by ambitious CEO Elon Musk is up about  240% YTD, and now sits at $121.

But Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s John Lovallo II and John Murphy are  holding firm to their original $39 price target.

In a note this morning, they write that there are “300,000 reasons” to be  skeptical of Tesla’s climb — that’s how many units the company’s current  compound annual growth rate implies would be sold in 2020:

… we estimate that a $120 share price implies  over 321K vehicle sales in 2020, which is a full 300K  units higher than our current 2013e and would represent a  7-year CAGR of 48%. We also note that this analysis assumes TSLA can  achieve EBIT margins of about 12.5% in 2020, which would be over 380bps better  than the 2012 average of BMW, Mercedes, Audi, Bentley, and Porsche and 400bps  better than our European analyst’s forecasts for this group in 2015.

A 48% growth rate has never been achieved by any other auto manufacturer  ever:

We analyzed the lifecycle of over 130 vehicles  categorized as luxury by Ward’s Auto, the result of which indicate that approx.  70% reach peak volume within the first 8 quarters of launch. In other words, if  Tesla’s vehicles follow a pattern similar to the industry norm, volumes could  begin leveling off within the next year, rather than growing into perpetuity as  the current share price would suggest.

They also warn the Q4 2013 gross margin growth target 0f 25%, even if  reached, could end up being the product of an accounting trick:

While Tesla has stated that its 25% 4Q13 gross  margin target excludes any potential positive impact from Zero Emission Vehicle  Credits (ZEVs), it remains unclear if the company intends to include the  potential benefit from Green House Gas Credits (GHG) or Corporate Average Fuel  Economy (CAFE) credits (both listed as “Other Regulatory Credits” in Tesla’s SEC  filings) in its calculation.

They conclude: “While nothing is impossible, particularly with Elon Musk at  the helm, we believe these assumptions warrant a healthy degree of  skepticism.”

Thank you, TiA

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Top Posts & Pages

POSTS

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

TEAM TiA!

%d bloggers like this: